tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3494139489725944617.post5852005297393132845..comments2010-08-11T21:39:07.472-04:00Travis Saundershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01371283927004419457noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3494139489725944617.post-66921968754903100492010-07-16T16:52:03.864-04:002010-07-16T16:52:03.864-04:00Well, Im sure you wont &quot;like&quot; this, but to be 100% honest, I stopped reading your blog when you went over to ScienceBlogs. Reason being, I cannot belive that while getting paid for the blog, the content remains the same as it would have outside of SB. Whatever you say wont convince me, when all of a sudden your words were sponsored and paid for by a corporation that is already dependant on advertising revenue to exist, it lost a lot of its credibility.<br />Im a little surprised that no one on SB seems to consider that the fact that they are corporate sponsored takes away some of their credo. Ive spoken to NUMEROUS people in the last few weeks about SB, and they have all agreed that they feel the bloggers there are corporately managed, and even if its subconscious, write with the ultimate goal of keeping SB happy and keeping their $ rolling in.<br />Maybe if SB had been run by a NFP or something like that people wouldnt feel this way, but I know for a fact that many people like myself will put more credit into what you write now that you are not at SB...so welcome back.Februahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04453691652082089448noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3494139489725944617.post-16223352158054639662010-07-16T14:49:38.118-04:002010-07-16T14:49:38.118-04:00Wise decision.Lavinia Rodriguez, Ph.D.http://www.FatMatters.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3494139489725944617.post-89935318845374528152010-07-16T14:20:50.881-04:002010-07-16T14:20:50.881-04:00A very welcome reminder that there is still such a thing as journalistic ethics in some communities.Todd I. Starkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02231844857877577527noreply@blogger.com