Subscribe to Obesity Panacea
Subscribe to Obesity Panacea
Subscribe to Obesity Panacea by mail

Physical Activity Reduces Risk of Childhood Fat Gain

Wednesday, December 02, 2009 Posted by Travis Saunders

Image by Mike Baird.


There is a surprising amount of controversy about the ability of physical activity to prevent the development of obesity. Sure, obese individuals tend to perform less physical activity than their lean counterparts, but that doesn't prove causation. And almost every week it seems that there is a news story reporting that the obesity epidemic is caused by diet. Period. If you believe these articles, physical activity plays a minor role, if any role at all. Some have even (erroneously) suggested that physical activity increases the risk of weight gain (for a thorough debunking of a recent TIME article on this subject, click here).

One of the problems of trying to untangle the role of physical activity in the development of obesity is that most studies use indirect measures of physical activity, like self-report questionnaires. Not surprisingly, there is a lot of error when people are reporting a socially-desirable behaviour like physical activity, as they tend to err on the positive side. And questionnaires also often give several fixed options, for example "Are you normally active for 15, 30, 45, or 60 minutes per day?". If you are active for 20 minutes per day, would you pick 15 or 30? Either way, it introduces a lot of error, which makes it very difficult to determine the specific role that your current physical activity levels play in the development of obesity down the road.

All of this brings me to a very interesting paper that has just been published in the British Medical Journal, which is available for free on the BMJ website. Author Chris Riddoch and colleagues asked 7159 12-year-old children to wear accelerometers for a full week. Accelerometers measure movement, and allow for the direct measurement of both the volume (minutes, hours, etc) and intensity (light, moderate, vigorous) of physical activity. This is the gold-standard for measuring physical activity, and a tremendous improvement over self-report questionnaires. They then had all of these participants come back to the lab at age 14, where they had their body fat mass directly measured using Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (also a gold-standard).

What did they find? The more physically active kids were at age 12, the lower their fat mass at age 14. Interestingly, these results were independent of fat mass at age 12. In other words, no matter how much fat mass a child had at age 12, if they were more physically active, they had less fat at age 14. In fact, for every 15-minute increase in daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at age 12, there was a 10% reduction in fat mass at age 14. Further, the authors also estimate that 12 year old children "who meet current health related recommendations of 60 minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity a day would be expected to have around 4.3 kg less fat mass at age 14 than children who do no moderate-vigorous physical activity" [emphasis added]. That's almost 10 lbs of body fat in just 2 years!!! As the authors point out, this type of strong relationship is not likely to play a trivial role in the development of obesity or chronic disease.

So, what is the take-home message? This well-designed study, with a HUGE sample size, clearly suggests that kids who are more active today have less fat mass tomorrow. That's certainly not a huge surprise, but it's an important finding, and one that directly counters the argument that physical activity is useless for obesity prevention. It also suggests that previous studies might not have seen any relationship between physical activity and obesity because their measures just weren't very sensitive. Traditional measures like body weight and self-reported physical activity are far less precise than those used in this study, and it makes sense that when we reduce the amount of error involved, we might get a clearer picture of what is truly going on (Not surprisingly, when the authors substituted body weight instead of directly measured fat mass in the present analysis, the relationships between physical activity and obesity diminished dramatically).

Even if you still don't buy that physical activity could reduce your risk (or your child's risk) of gaining excess fat mass down the road, keep in mind that irrespective of body weight, increased physical activity is associated with dramatically lower risk of just about every chronic disease there is. Just a few more reasons to work a bit of physical activity into your day!

Travis

Enjoyed this post? Subscribe to Obesity Panacea and have future posts delivered regularly to your email account or your RSS reader.


ResearchBlogging.orgRiddoch, C., Leary, S., Ness, A., Blair, S., Deere, K., Mattocks, C., Griffiths, A., Davey Smith, G., & Tilling, K. (2009). Prospective associations between objective measures of physical activity and fat mass in 12-14 year old children: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) BMJ, 339 (nov26 2) DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b4544



Enjoyed this story? Share it with your friends by clicking the buttons below!

Twitter Facebook Digg It! Stumble Delicious Technorati

To get future posts delivered directly to your email inbox or to your RSS reader, be sure to subscribe to Obesity Panacea.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Response to "Physical Activity Reduces Risk of Childhood Fat Gain"

  1. Rob Said,

    Why is it not obvious that weight gain and loss absolutely must follow the laws of chemistry and physics? If you burn more calories than you eat, you will lose weight. To claim otherwise violates the second law of physics. Of course diet is important, but weight is absolutely and totally controlled by the balance between caloric intake and consumption.

    Posted on December 2, 2009 at 7:57 AM

     
  2. Anonymous Said,

    Exercise improves body composition even if the scale doesn't change.

    Posted on December 2, 2009 at 2:29 PM

     
  3. Travis Saunders Said,

    @ Rob,

    You are right, body weight is absolutely the result of energy in vs energy out. The problem is that energy in and energy out are influenced by numerous factors, including each other. So the argument often goes that exercise increases appetite, which increases food intake, which negates the benefits of physical activity (with respect to body weight at least). I'm not saying that I buy that argument, but it does have some traction, which is why findings like this are so exciting.

    @ Anonymous,

    I couldn't agree more!

    Posted on December 2, 2009 at 7:03 PM

     
  4. Jan Said,

    You are right by being cautions on drawing hard conclusions, because it is an observational study.

    But I really doubt this will fly. The reason is that we really had strong correlations on excercise in childhood and happiness. In 2007 a twinstudy showed that there is no such relation (yeah, the Dutch spoiled it again ;-). And no, I'm not against exercise, but although I applaud your caution, I do detect a certain bias on your enjoyable blog.

    Posted on December 7, 2009 at 4:40 PM

     
  5. Travis Saunders Said,

    Hi Jan,

    Thanks for the comment, but I'm not sure I completely understand what you're getting at? I take it you think that the physical activity is not itself causing the lowered weight gain?

    Could you send me a link or the reference of the Dutch study you mentioned? I'd love to check it out.

    You are right - we are a little biased towards exercise, but you'd be surprised how open we are to changing our opinion when presented with strong data (it has happened more than once in the past year!).

    Travis

    Posted on December 7, 2009 at 4:50 PM

     
  6. Jan Said,

    Hi Travis,

    The point is that the most physical active kids could be more active by genetics and also slim by genetics. We use to think that active kids grew up to be happier. That association came into new light with this study among 85.000 twins.

    http://www.tweelingenregister.org/nederlands/verslaggeving/NTR-publicaties_2007/Stubbe_PM_2007.pdf

    Happier kids (genetics) are more active.

    Posted on December 8, 2009 at 8:50 AM

     

Blog Archive

Recent Posts

Peter's Travel Adventures on PhD Nomads

About Us

We are PhD students in the School of Kinesiology and Health Studies at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario. Our research focuses on the relationships between obesity, physical activity, and health risk. This blog is our attempt to consider the many "cures" for obesity that we read about on a daily basis. Enjoy.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed here belong only to Peter and Travis and do not reflect the views of any organization. Any medical discussion on this page is intended to be of a general nature only. This page is not designed to give specific medical advice. If you have a medical problem you should consult your own physician for advice specific to your own situation.

Donate To Obesity Panacea

Visitors